The birth of Astrology

Moderators: MGmirkinbboyer

 

The birth of Astrology

Unread postby 303vegas » Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:38 am

Hi there Buckaneers!

Here's one for you:

What if the break-up of the postulated Saturnian system, of which earth was apparently a part, led to the creation of astrology?

If we assume that we had been part of the previous set-up for all of the preceeding period human evolution then such a cataclyamic event could perhaps lead to increased observation of the newly altered environment, tracking the movements the planets in their new orbits and the effect of this upon human personalities, physiology and society?

Any thoughts?

x

love from lancashire!
User avatar
303vegas
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:55 am
Location: Rochdale, england

Re: The birth of Astrology

Unread postby tayga » Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:15 pm

I'd say it was a near-certainty. 

The fear that death and destruction might strike again from the heavens and the observation of patterns that promised prediction would have led to an obsessive study of the motion of the planets and stars. I think the tradition of astrology probably dates from around that time.

Ask someone who doesn't know about the Saturn system break up why we have special names for the planets that are also the names of gods when it takes a half-trained astronomer to spot any of them today and distinguish them from the stars. I'd be interested to know if you ever got a sensible answer.

tayga

It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.
- Richard P. Feynman

Normal science does not aim at novelties of fact or theory and, when successful, finds none.
- Thomas Kuhn

User avatar
tayga
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:54 am

Re: The birth of Astrology

Unread postby nick c » Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:42 pm

Velikovsky wrote:Astrology interested itself chiefly with the relative positions of planers and with their conjunctions. Diodorus of Sicily, after recording the Chaldeans assert that planets change their velocities and periods of time, says: “These stars exert the greatest influence for both good and evil upon the nativity of men; and it is chiefly from the nature of these planets and the study of them that they know what is in store for mankind.”(1)

It is perfectly correct to say as Diodorus did because of the great changes which were brought upon mankind and the nature of everything living on this planet by encounters with other planets. But from the truth of this belief of the Chaldeans and to the wrong conclusions was but a short distance. If the planets at their different encounters caused flood, hurricane, or conflagration, destruction of animals, or appearance of new plants, man could easily conclude that this or that consequence is the result of a special character of this or that planet.

http://www.varchive.org/ce/astrology.html

User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: The birth of Astrology

Unread postby 303vegas » Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:37 am

Cheers folks. Didn't think I'd get a reply. I've heard orthodox astronomers saying the usual stuff about how the movements of the other planets can have no effect whatsoever on our world and its inhabitants as 'gravity' is not strong enough. However once you put it all into an electro-magnetic context you realize that all the planets are traveling through and interacting with eachother's magnetospheres (even the bodies which don't have one of their own.) This kind of rough and tumble is surely bound to influence any inhabitants of the worlds involved.
love from lancashire!
User avatar
303vegas
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:55 am
Location: Rochdale, england

Re: The birth of Astrology

Unread postby Lloyd » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:09 am

We had a discussion of astrology here sometime back, I guess it was early this year. I started the thread at that time. I learned astrology myself in 1977 and thereafter. I think Nick and several others here consider astrology to be more or less accurate, except for predictive astrology etc.

Astrology Website
A good place to find out your own planetary and house nativity patterns for free is at http://alabe.com. Once you find out your planetary aspects and houses, you can do a net search for the specific ones, such as Mars conjunct Mercury, or Moon in the Tenth House. The Alabe site also gives a little bit of info about some of the planets in the signs and houses.

Astrology Science
I heard once that astrology originated about 4,500 years ago. That would be possibly during or just after much of the cataclysmic events of that time among Saturn's planets and moons etc. The Chaldeans or Sumerians may have been among the first to use astrology or something like it. Michel Gauguelin of France was a statistician in the 1970s who intended to use his skills to disprove astrology, but, instead, he tended to confirm the basic idea that the arrangement of planets in the solar system affects humans and probably all life on Earth. For example, he found that people with a specific occupation tended to be born when a certain planet appeared from a perspective on Earth to be on the horizon or at the midheaven or the middle of the sky below one's position on Earth. So something like 50% were born when the planet was at or very near one of those "cardinal" points. He studied thousands of people for each occupation in Europe.

Human Mind Origins
Those who've read Julian Jaynes' book on "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind" may understand that humans don't seem to have had the same kinds of minds then that we have today. The modern mind seems to have originated around 500 BC. Before that humans seem not to have acted much on their own volition. Instead, they heard voices in their heads, which were perhaps the voices of their elders and ancestors, and these voices told them what to do. They didn't make their own decisions, but only followed orders from their own memories of the voices of elders. Of course, the elders did the same thing.

Bible Code
The Old and New Testament Bibles both have extraordinary numerical codes within them, and I don't mean Michael Drosnin's claimed code, which is a fraud with political motives. Ivan Panin first discovered the real codes. Another writer (I thought his name was Dale Washburn, but that seems to be not quite right) tried to verify Panin's finding, but wasn't able to, but he did find a similar code, not associated with all of the text, but just with various phrases or names. I think Jesus or Christ was associated with number 8. That means the number of letters in the word or phrase was evenly divisible by 8 and the number of times the word or phrase appears in the Bible was divisible by 8. It was calculated that the odds against such codes appearing in the Bible by human intention were extremely high, because it would have required the ability to make advanced computer calculations with many supercomputers over hundreds of years. 

Group Mind
A related matter that has been discussed on this forum, or on the first incarnation of this forum, is group mind. Some catastrophists, one of the Roger's, I think, i.e. Roger Ashton or Roger Wescott, got the idea from ancient myths that humans and all animals had a group mind in ancient times, similar to telepathy, possibly enhanced by greater electrical charge on the Earth at that time. If that and the Bible code are correct, then the Bible was produced supernaturally, or maybe more likely by a group mind. A group mind may be able to make calculations like many supercomputers and the language itself may even be programmed to be able to do that. Initially, the group mind may have included all humans and animals, but later it may have been limited to those who learned to use certain "spiritual" discipline, like fasting, prayer and meditation etc. If the group mind was intelligent enough to see what was coming in the future, including the decline of the group mind due to catastrophes, it may have determined to find ways to maintain itself via subconsciousness or via biological programming etc. And I guess that means the chaos that civilization seems to be attracted to, or any self-fulfilling doomsday forecasts, may be programmed for ultimate defeat and the triumph of humanity.

Lloyd
 
Posts: 4079
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: The birth of Astrology

Unread postby nick c » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:21 pm

My post above was to illustrate the origin of Astrology in our catastrophic past. Velikovsky's quote is not an endorsement of Astrology, but rather a comment on the conditions that gave rise to the practice. Humankind watched and charted the position of the planets out of dire necessity. When the solar system achieved the present order this practice continued and the religion of Astrology was born, it is an extension of planetary worship. This trend took place all over the world. It is important to note that the fixed stars/constellations are no more than the background through which the real influences move, those being the planets, Sun, and Moon.
I do not endorse Astrology per se, however, I believe in keeping an open mind and as mainstream's high priests of science often deride Astrology, I would expect that these pronouncements must be backed by some sort of statistical evidence. I have never seen any sort of 'scientific' refutation, on the contrary, the only researcher to my knowledge (Michel Gauquelin) to have done any statistical analysis came up with correlations to occupations and planetary positions at birth. The mainstream science police immediately jumped on the case; there was no interest in investigating the legitimacy of the research only in discrediting the author at all costs. Dennis Rawlins was one of the inner circle of the Commitee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CISCOP); his sense of what is right and wrong got the best of him and he exposed the behind the scenes machinations of that organization's attempts to discredit an honest researcher whose only mistake was to dare to investigate a subject that was determined to be 'taboo.'

sTARBABY by Dennis Rawlins

I think that proponents of the Electric Universe can relate to these underhanded methods.
The irony, as I see it, is that Astrology is extremely easy to test with routine statistical analysis. As an example, following Gauquelin's methodology, let us say that Astrology predicts that professional athletes should have Mars near the Midheaven at birth. Mars is the planet governing athletics and the midheaven is the cusp of the tenth house which governs profession. Allow a 5 degree margin on each side of the midheaven. So Mars should be in a 10 degree section out of 360 possible degreees. Examine a thousand or more horoscopes of professional athletes and compare the number who have Mars in that 10 degree area to what would be a random distribution, which is 1 in 36. That is sort of what Gauquelin did and he came up with significant statistical correlations.
If this was not a taboo subject for mainstream science we could get some interesting results - one way or another. My point is that Astrology is scientifically testable. But woe to any researcher who would dare to take on this task!

User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: The birth of Astrology

Unread postby Sco4444 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:00 am

Nick C wrote » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:21 pm:

"I think that proponents of the Electric Universe can relate to these underhanded methods..(CISCOP)...
The irony, as I see it, is that Astrology is extremely easy to test with routine statistical analysis. ..i.e.. Gauquelin's methodology".

With respect to testing, around the same time Dean produced "Recent Advances in Natal Astrology" which attempted to statistically critically review Astrology including a summary of Gauquelin's work. The book only found interest with stats. minded Astrologers.

However, WD Gann and George Bayer (1940's), claimed that their financial fortunes were due to Astrological interpretation of Stock market conditions. They did not use mainstream astrology methods however. According to Jeanne Long in her book "Universal Clock", WD Gann used a system taken from cuniform script tablets from Sumerian times 2000 + BC which used an harmonic division of the houses and specific degree indexing. (Believed to originate much earlier)

Part of Bayer's system is however more obvious and relates to the planetary motions around the Sun, especially Alphelion and Perihelion positions and their effect on human mass behaviour and hence stock market movement. As Nick states all these things are testable.

Recent research, see (Sciencedaily.com - "Space Climate Forecasting"). states that the planets have an effect on the Sun which causes Space Weather. This would seem logical if plasma envelops everything including human beings. If verified this could be interpreted as repeating cycles and arguably, Astrology has always been about the study of how planetary cycles affect Nations and Kings, humans getting in the way.

What is not clear however is that the cycle is never back to the same point, so only similar conditions exist and to my knowledge equations of planetary motion have never made obvious the Sun's path around the galaxy, producing spirals (Ellipse) not circles of the planets that are not going to repeat for approx 26,000 yrs due to Precession (Sun's galactic Day ). with Sun's Galactic Year approx 240 million yrs; not even the later can be seen as a return to the beginning due to Galactic motion through Universe.

So Astrology could be seen as the study of cycles within cycles and at present we do not have the technology to measure the interactions of plasma and electro-magnetic forces as they apply to the Galaxy/Sun, Sun/Earth or Earth/Life forms to accurately predict Space weather systems, Earth weather systems (Earthquakes/Hurricanes) or human mass behaviour (Stock market / Revolutions). Hope this hasn't strayed too far off thread but if future technological advances validate Cosmic Cycle effects they will be absorbed into relevant diciples i.e. Psychology, Social Systems Economics for human behaviour. Space weather (CMB's). Earth weather (Earthquakes etc).

Astrology

Astrology interested itself chiefly with the relative positions of planers and with their conjunctions. Diodorus of Sicily, after recording the Chaldeans assert that planets change their velocities and periods of time, says: “These stars exert the greatest influence for both good and evil upon the nativity of men; and it is chiefly from the nature of these planets and the study of them that they know what is in store for mankind.”(1)

It is perfectly correct to say as Diodorus did because of the great changes which were brought upon mankind and the nature of everything living on this planet by encounters with other planets. But from the truth of this belief of the Chaldeans and to the wrong conclusions was but a short distance. If the planets at their different encounters caused flood, hurricane, or conflagration, destruction of animals, or appearance of new plants, man could easily conclude that this or that consequence is the result of a special character of this or that planet.

The Chaldeans tried to build their astrology empirically: they noticed every year the movements of the stars, the conjunctions that took place and the political and natural changes in the realm. Very many such observations were made and written down.(2) From the idea that the position of planets influences the nature and the life of nations and kings, to the idea that it influences a single individual, was but one step. A fiery character of some men could be compared with the fiery character of Venus or Mars. In the Tractate Sanhedrin of the Babylonian Talmud it is said that “He who is born under Venus will be wealthy and unchaste. What is the reason? Because fire was created therein. . . He who is born under Mars will be a shedder of blood.”(3)

It was supposed that the position of planets in the hour of conception is fateful for the building of the character and also for the future of the individual. So for example in the book of Hindi; astrology. The Bri-hajgatakam of Varaha Mihira, it is said: “When Venus and Saturn are in one sign, persons become short-sighted, earn money, and increase it through their wives or young women, are authors and painters . . .”(4)Sahagun reports that among the Aztecs “soothsayers who tell the good or bad fortune children are going to have, according to the date, time or signs of their birth.”(5)

 

Astrology: Is it scientific?
Horoscope

In some ways, astrology may seem scientific. It uses scientific knowledge about heavenly bodies, as well as scientific sounding tools, like star charts. Some people use astrology to generate expectations about future events and people's personalities, much as scientific ideas generate expectations. And some claim that astrology is supported by evidence — the experiences of people who feel that astrology has worked for them. But even with these trappings of science, is astrology really a scientific way to answer questions?

Here we'll use the Science Checklist to evaluate one way in which astrology is commonly used. See if you think it qualifies as scientific!

Planets and galaxy

Focuses on the natural world?
Astrology's basic premise is that heavenly bodies — the sun, moon, planets, and constellations — have influence over or are correlated with earthly events.

Aims to explain the natural world?
Astrology uses a set of rules about the relative positions and movements of heavenly bodies to generate predictions and explanations for events on Earth and human personality traits. For example, some forms of astrology predict that a person born just after the spring equinox is particularly likely to become an entrepreneur.
Uses testable ideas?
Some expectations generated by astrology are so general that any outcome could be interpreted as fitting the expectations; if treated this way, astrology is not testable. However, some have used astrology to generate very specific expectations that could be verified against outcomes in the natural world. For example, according to astrology, one's zodiac sign impacts one's ability to command respect and authority. Since these traits are important in politics, we might expect that if astrology really explained people's personalities, scientists would be more likely to have zodiac signs that astrologers describe as "favorable" towards science.1 If used to generate specific expectations like this one, astrological ideas are testable.
Relies on evidence?
In the few cases where astrology has been used to generate testable expectations and the results were examined in a careful study, the evidence did not support the validity of astrological ideas.2 This experience is common in science — scientists often test ideas that turn out to be wrong. However, one of the hallmarks of science is that ideas are modified when warranted by the evidence. Astrology has not changed its ideas in response to contradictory evidence.
Newspaper horoscope
Many astrological predictions appear in newspapers — not in places where they will be scrutinized by the scientific community.

Involves the scientific community?
Sharing one's findings and critically evaluating the results of others are not integral parts of practicing astrology. An astrologer can go his or her entire career and not present findings at a scientific meeting or publish a single article. When astrologers do publish, these articles are not usually peer-reviewed or published in places where they will be critically scrutinized by the scientific community.

Leads to ongoing research?
Scientific studies involving astrology have stopped after attempting and failing to establish the validity of astrological ideas. So far, there are no documented cases of astrology contributing to a new scientific discovery.
Researchers behave scientifically?
Scientists don't wait for others to do the research to support or contradict the ideas they propose. Instead, they strive to test their ideas, try to come up with counterarguments and alternative hypotheses, and ultimately, give up ideas when warranted by the evidence. Astrologers, on the other hand, do not seem to rigorously examine the astrological ideas they accept. As reflected by the minimal level of research in the field, they rarely try to test their arguments in fair ways. In addition, the astrological community largely ignores evidence that contradicts its ideas.